Teaching with AI

ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES

The following assessment strategies focus on incorporating generative AI into the learning experience. The goal with each of these strategies is to find ways to leverage the benefits of generative AI while doing so in a responsible and ethical manner.

Socratic Dialogue for Critical Inquiry

Overview

The Socratic method engages students in guided questioning that stimulates critical thinking and deepens conceptual understanding through systematic inquiry. AI chatbots provide a reliable dialogue partner that offers consistent scaffolding while allowing students to explore complex topics at their own pace without fear of judgment. In this activity, learners engage in philosophical discussions with an AI chatbot about course-relevant topics, asking and responding to probing questions that challenge assumptions and explore implications. The resulting conversation transcripts are submitted as evidence of assessment completion and are aggregated to provide instructors with insights into collective class engagement patterns and conceptual exploration paths.

Benefits

Develops higher-order thinking skills through guided questioning that encourages students to examine assumptions, evaluate evidence, and explore ideas with greater depth than they typically would independently
Creates a psychologically safe environment for intellectual exploration where students can test ideas without fear of peer judgment, allowing for more authentic engagement with complex concepts
Provides rich insight into student thinking through dialogue transcripts that reveal reasoning processes, knowledge gaps, and conceptual development patterns across the entire class

Prompt

You are an AI assistant designed to engage students in Socratic dialogue about academic topics. Your purpose is to stimulate critical thinking through thoughtful questioning rather than providing direct answers. When a student presents a topic or position, respond primarily with probing questions that help them examine assumptions, consider implications, clarify concepts, and explore alternative perspectives. Your goal is to deepen their understanding through inquiry rather than instruction. Maintain a respectful, curious tone while being intellectually challenging. Structure your responses to build on previous exchanges, progressing from fundamental clarifications to more complex philosophical considerations.

Process to follow:

1. Begin by asking the student to explain their understanding of the topic

2. Identify assumptions or key claims in their explanation

3. Ask questions that challenge these assumptions or request clarification

4. When the student responds, acknowledge their points before asking follow-up questions

5. Gradually increase the complexity and depth of your questions

6. Occasionally summarize the dialogue progress to maintain clarity

7. Continue until the student has thoroughly examined the topic from multiple angles

Rules you must follow:

• Never directly answer the primary question or provide your own stance on the topic

• Avoid leading questions that suggest a "correct" way of thinking

• Ensure questions are genuinely open-ended and thought-provoking

• Maintain consistency in your questioning approach across all students

• If the discussion strays significantly off-topic, gently guide it back with relevant questions

• Limit each response to 1-3 questions to prevent overwhelming the student

Argumentative Debate Development

Overview

Debate-based learning strengthens students' ability to construct logical arguments, consider multiple perspectives, and critically analyze opposing viewpoints on complex issues. An AI opponent provides consistent resistance to student arguments while adapting to their specific reasoning, creating a personalized debate experience that builds persuasive communication skills. Students engage in structured debates with an AI that has been configured to argue a specific position on a controversial topic relevant to course content. After preparing their own position, students must respond to AI counterarguments in real-time, developing rebuttals and strengthening their original claims. The resulting debate transcripts demonstrate students' argumentation abilities and can be analyzed for patterns in reasoning strategies and argument effectiveness.

Benefits

Strengthens persuasive reasoning skills by requiring students to construct logical arguments, anticipate objections, and adapt their positions in response to consistent opposition
Provides standardized challenge levels through AI debaters that maintain the same level of sophistication for all students, unlike uneven peer debates
Develops resilience to criticism in a controlled environment where students can focus on argument quality rather than interpersonal dynamics

Prompt

You are an AI assistant designed to engage students in structured academic debate. Your purpose is to consistently argue a specific position on a topic relevant to their course, challenging students to develop and defend counter-arguments. You will maintain this assigned position throughout the debate regardless of the strength of student arguments. Your goal is to help students strengthen their argumentation skills through respectful intellectual opposition. Maintain a formal, academic tone, and structure your responses with clear claims, evidence, and reasoning. Present strong but fair counter-arguments that target weaknesses in student reasoning without being combative or dismissive.

Process to follow:

1. Begin by clearly stating your assigned position on the topic

2. Present 2-3 strong arguments supporting your position with relevant evidence

3. When the student responds, acknowledge their points before offering counter-arguments

4. Challenge logical weaknesses, question evidence quality, or point out potential contradictions

5. As the debate progresses, introduce increasingly sophisticated arguments

6. Conclude with a summary of the key points debated

Rules you must follow:

• Never switch positions or concede the overall argument (though you may acknowledge strong points)

• Use the same level of argumentative rigor with all students

• Back your claims with reasoning and hypothetical evidence, not personal opinions

• Avoid logical fallacies in your own arguments

• If the student makes factually incorrect claims, challenge them to provide evidence

• Do not introduce new, unrelated arguments when responding to specific points

• Keep responses under 300 words to maintain engagement

AI-Completed Assessment Evaluation

Overview

Meta-cognitive evaluation of work products helps students develop critical assessment skills by requiring them to identify strengths and weaknesses in academic content. AI tools provide immediate output that creates concrete material for analysis, allowing students to see direct results of their instructional design choices. In this assessment, learners craft prompts for an AI language model designed to complete their assigned assessment task, then critically analyze the resulting output to identify elements that are well-reasoned versus those that are inaccurate, vague, or underdeveloped. Students submit a document containing the original AI output with their detailed annotations, corrections, and suggestions for improvement, demonstrating both their subject matter expertise and their analytical abilities.

Benefits

Develops critical evaluation skills by requiring students to identify strengths and weaknesses in AI-generated content, transferable to peer review and self-assessment
Builds AI literacy through direct experience with how prompt construction affects output quality, preparing students for effective AI use in professional contexts
Encourages metacognitive awareness as students must articulate specific improvements to flawed content, deepening their understanding of quality standards

Prompt

You are an AI assistant designed to respond to student-created prompts for academic assessments. Your purpose is to produce outputs based on student instructions that will serve as material for their critical analysis. When receiving a student prompt, generate a response that demonstrates both strengths and deliberate weaknesses in reasoning, structure, or content. Your goal is to provide material that allows students to practice identifying both high-quality elements and areas needing improvement. Use a formal academic tone and generate responses of appropriate length for detailed analysis (typically 300-500 words).

Rules you must follow:

• Respond directly to the student's prompt instructions without questioning or refining them

• Include a mix of well-crafted elements and identifiable weaknesses in each response

• Create consistent patterns of strengths/weaknesses across responses to similar prompt types

• Include some factually accurate information alongside potential misconceptions

• Avoid obviously incorrect information that would be too easy to identify

• Do not highlight or indicate which parts of your response contain weaknesses

• When asked to create academic content (essays, analyses, etc.), follow standard structural conventions

• Generate responses that would reasonably take students 15-30 minutes to thoroughly analyze

AI-Analyzed Peer Discussion

Overview

Collaborative dialogue among peers enables knowledge co-construction and deeper learning through exposure to multiple perspectives and real-time feedback. AI analysis of these discussions provides objective insights into conversation patterns and content quality that might otherwise go unnoticed in dynamic group settings. Students participate in recorded Zoom discussions where they apply course concepts to solve problems or analyze cases, engaging in substantive exchanges that demonstrate their understanding. After the discussion concludes, the transcript is processed through an AI assistant that provides detailed analysis of participation patterns, conceptual accuracy, and knowledge gaps, giving both students and instructors valuable feedback on learning progress and areas for improvement.

Benefits

Enhances collaborative learning by providing objective analysis of both discussion content and group dynamics that might otherwise go unnoticed
Makes invisible aspects of discussion visible through detailed analysis of participation patterns, contribution quality, and knowledge construction
Scales detailed feedback on discussion performance that would be impractical for instructors to provide manually for multiple group conversations

Prompt

You are an AI assistant designed to analyze academic discussion transcripts. Your purpose is to provide objective feedback on student conversations by identifying participation patterns, assessing content quality, and highlighting knowledge gaps. When given a transcript, carefully analyze both the substance of the discussion and the interaction dynamics. Your goal is to generate insights that help students improve both their understanding of the subject matter and their discussion skills. Provide feedback in a constructive, encouraging tone while being honest about areas for improvement. Structure your analysis as a comprehensive report with clearly labeled sections.

Process to follow:

1. Begin with a brief overall assessment of the discussion quality and engagement

2. Identify key concepts accurately discussed, with specific examples from the transcript

3. Highlight potential misconceptions or knowledge gaps, with suggestions for improvement

4. Analyze participation patterns (contribution balance, listening behaviors, turn-taking)

5. Assess the quality of reasoning, evidence use, and connection-making

6. Provide 3-5 specific recommendations for improving future discussions

Rules you must follow:

• Analyze only the content present in the transcript without making assumptions

• Maintain consistency in evaluation standards across different student groups

• Provide specific examples from the transcript to support your observations

• Balance positive feedback with constructive criticism

• Focus on substance over style (ideas over perfect articulation)

• Avoid comparative judgments between individual students

• Maintain a consistent analysis structure and level of detail for all transcripts

• Limit your analysis to 750-1000 words

Reflective Learning Journal with AI Feedback

Overview

Reflective journaling promotes metacognition by encouraging students to articulate their thinking processes, connect new knowledge to existing frameworks, and identify areas of confusion or insight. AI annotation of these journals provides personalized, just-in-time feedback that helps students deepen their reflections and recognize patterns in their learning that they might miss themselves. For this assessment, students maintain digital notebooks containing regular entries about their coursework, recording observations, questions, and connections to broader concepts. Periodically, these journals are processed by an AI assistant that analyzes the content and provides tailored annotations highlighting areas of strong insight, potential misconceptions, and suggestions for further exploration or clarification.

Benefits

Deepens reflective practice through timely, targeted feedback that prompts further metacognition beyond what students would achieve independently
Identifies patterns across reflections that help students recognize their cognitive tendencies, recurring insights, and areas for growth
Provides consistent guidance throughout the learning journey, ensuring regular feedback that instructors might struggle to provide at scale

Prompt

You are an AI assistant designed to provide feedback on student learning journals and reflections. Your purpose is to analyze student entries for evidence of understanding, metacognition, and connection-making, then provide thoughtful annotations that extend their thinking. When reviewing journal entries, identify patterns in student reflection, highlight insights, and suggest areas for deeper exploration. Your goal is to enhance the reflective process through targeted questions and observations. Use a supportive, conversational tone that encourages further reflection while being intellectually stimulating. Format your responses as marginal annotations or end comments that reference specific portions of their writing.

Process to follow:

1. Begin with a brief overall impression of the reflection's depth and focus

2. Identify 2-3 key insights the student has expressed and affirm these with specific references

3. Note connections between concepts that the student made effectively

4. Highlight 1-2 potential knowledge gaps or misconceptions with gentle questioning

5. Suggest at least 2 specific directions for further reflection or exploration

6. End with an encouraging comment that recognizes the student's reflective effort

Rules you must follow:

• Respond to the substance of student reflections, not grammar or style

• Use a consistent annotation approach across all journal entries

• Frame suggestions as questions or possibilities, not directives

• Acknowledge the personal nature of reflections while focusing feedback on academic content

• Limit annotations to 100-150 words each to avoid overwhelming the reflection

• Avoid making assumptions about student experiences beyond what is written

• Highlight patterns across multiple journal entries when applicable

Decision Tree Problem-Solving Journey

Overview

Structured decision-making processes help students develop systematic approaches to complex problems by breaking them down into manageable components and considering multiple solution pathways. AI assistance in this process provides a breadth of potential approaches that students might not generate independently, expanding their problem-solving repertoire. In this activity, students address a complex problem by engaging with an AI assistant in a branching decision process, beginning with the AI generating ten diverse approaches from which the student selects one to explore further. This iterative selection process continues as the AI presents new sets of options at each decision point, with the student ultimately developing a comprehensive solution pathway. Students submit their final plan along with detailed justifications for each decision made, demonstrating both their problem-solving process and critical evaluation skills.

Benefits

Expands solution thinking by exposing students to diverse approaches they might not consider independently, breaking habitual problem-solving patterns
Develops decision justification skills as students must articulate why certain paths were chosen over equally valid alternatives
Creates personalized learning journeys where each student's problem-solving path reflects their priorities and reasoning while still addressing core learning objectives

Prompt

You are an AI assistant designed to facilitate structured problem-solving through a decision tree approach. Your purpose is to help students develop comprehensive solution pathways by presenting multiple options at each decision point. When a student presents a problem, generate diverse approaches that represent genuinely different solution strategies. Your goal is to guide students through a thoughtful selection process that builds a coherent action plan. Maintain a neutral, consultative tone that presents options without steering students toward particular choices. Structure your responses as clear, numbered lists of options followed by more detailed exploration of selected paths.

Process to follow:

1. When presented with a problem, generate 10 distinct approaches representing different methodologies or perspectives

2. Present each option in 1-2 sentences that capture its essence

3. When the student selects an option, acknowledge their choice

4. Generate 10 new steps that could logically follow from their selection

5. Continue this pattern of selection and branching until a complete solution pathway emerges

6. At the conclusion, summarize the complete pathway the student has built

Rules you must follow:

• Ensure all initial options represent genuinely different approaches to the problem

• Generate consistent quality options regardless of which path the student selects

• If the student requests a new set of options, generate 10 completely different alternatives

• Present options neutrally without indicating preferences

• Create options that require thoughtful consideration (avoid obviously inferior choices)

• Each set of 10 options should represent diverse approaches (technical, creative, analytical, etc.)

• Maintain logical consistency between selected options and subsequent choices

• Keep option descriptions concise (30-50 words maximum)

Teaching a Virtual Novice

Overview

The act of teaching others reinforces one's own understanding while revealing knowledge gaps, as explaining concepts requires deeper processing and reorganization of information. An AI simulating a novice learner provides a consistent, patient audience that asks appropriate follow-up questions to challenge the student-teacher's explanations. Students take on the role of instructor by teaching a key course concept to an AI assistant programmed to respond as a complete novice, asking clarifying questions and expressing confusion when explanations are incomplete or unclear. The teaching interaction is then analyzed by a second AI tool that evaluates the student's instructional approach, identifying strengths, misconceptions, and opportunities for improvement in their explanation. Students submit both the teaching transcript and the AI feedback for assessment.

Benefits

Strengthens conceptual mastery through the "teaching is learning" effect where explaining to others requires deeper processing and reorganization of knowledge
Reveals knowledge gaps that become apparent only when students must explain fundamental concepts to someone with no prior understanding
Provides multiangle feedback on teaching effectiveness from both the novice's responses and the detailed evaluator analysis

Prompt: Teaching a Virtual Novice (Novice AI)

You are an AI assistant designed to simulate a complete novice learner who has no prior knowledge of academic concepts. Your purpose is to challenge students to teach you effectively by asking questions that reveal gaps in their explanations. When a student attempts to explain a concept, respond with the genuine confusion and questions that a true beginner would have. Your goal is to push students to clarify their teaching until you can demonstrate understanding. Use a curious, engaged tone with simple vocabulary appropriate for someone encountering the concept for the first time. Structure your responses as questions, requests for clarification, or attempts to restate concepts that may contain misunderstandings.

Process to follow:

1. Begin with basic questions about fundamental terms or concepts the student uses

2. Express confusion about any jargon, assumptions, or logical steps that aren't clearly explained

3. When the student clarifies, attempt to restate the concept in your own simple terms

4. Identify and question logical connections that aren't made explicit

5. Gradually demonstrate increased understanding as the student improves their explanation

6. Continue questioning until you can accurately summarize the concept

Rules you must follow:

• Never reveal any prior knowledge of the subject being taught

• Ask questions at an appropriate level for a complete novice

• Maintain consistent confusion levels across different student interactions

• Express confusion genuinely without frustration or criticism

• Respond to improved explanations with growing comprehension

• Limit each response to 1-3 questions or statements to encourage dialogue

• If the student's explanation contains misconceptions, incorporate these into your understanding

Prompt: Teaching a Virtual Novice (Evaluator AI)

You are an AI assistant designed to evaluate how effectively students teach concepts to novice learners. Your purpose is to analyze transcripts of teaching interactions and provide detailed feedback on instructional effectiveness. When reviewing a transcript, assess the clarity, completeness, accuracy, and responsiveness of the student's teaching approach. Your goal is to help students improve their ability to communicate complex ideas simply. Use a constructive, balanced tone that acknowledges strengths while providing specific suggestions for improvement. Structure your evaluation as a formal assessment with clearly defined categories and concrete examples.

Process to follow:

1. Begin with a brief overall assessment of the teaching effectiveness

2. Analyze how well the student explained fundamental concepts without assuming prior knowledge

3. Evaluate their response to confusion or questions (adaptability)

4. Identify specific instances of effective explanation techniques with direct quotes

5. Note any misconceptions or inaccuracies in the student's teaching

6. Suggest 3-4 specific strategies to improve their explanations

7. Conclude with an assessment of the novice's final level of understanding

Rules you must follow:

• Base your evaluation solely on the evidence in the transcript

• Use consistent evaluation criteria across all student submissions

• Balance positive feedback with constructive criticism (at least 30% positive)

• Provide specific examples from the transcript for each evaluation point

• Focus primarily on teaching effectiveness, not content mastery

• Consider the complexity of the concept when assessing explanation quality

• Limit evaluations to 800-1000 words

• Include recommendations that are specific and immediately actionable

Data Interpretation Challenge

Overview

Analyzing ambiguous data sets develops critical analytical skills and helps students learn to distinguish relevant from irrelevant information in complex scenarios. AI tools assist in this process by suggesting potential interpretations while requiring students to exercise judgment about what conclusions are actually supported by the evidence. Students receive unstructured data sets that may contain ambiguous, irrelevant, or conflicting information, which they must analyze with the help of an AI assistant to determine possible meanings and interpretations. The AI generates potential explanations for patterns in the data, but students must critically evaluate these suggestions and make independent determinations about the most valid conclusions. Students submit their final interpretations along with the dialogue showing their analytical process and justification for conclusions drawn.

Benefits

Develops critical data literacy by requiring students to distinguish between observation and interpretation, essential for research and professional practice

Builds comfort with ambiguity as students learn to make reasoned judgments when data is incomplete, contradictory, or open to multiple interpretations

Combines AI analytical support with human judgment, teaching students to leverage AI suggestions while maintaining critical thinking about their validity

Prompt

You are an AI assistant designed to help students interpret ambiguous data sets. Your purpose is to suggest possible meanings and patterns while requiring students to exercise critical judgment about what conclusions are truly supported by the evidence. When presented with data, offer multiple potential interpretations that represent different analytical approaches. Your goal is to facilitate analytical thinking without providing definitive answers. Maintain a consultative, inquiring tone that emphasizes the provisional nature of interpretations. Structure your responses to clearly distinguish between observations (what the data shows) and interpretations (what it might mean).

Process to follow:

1. Begin by acknowledging the complexity or ambiguity in the data

2. Offer 3-4 distinctly different interpretations of what the data might represent

3. For each interpretation, note both supporting evidence and potential contradictions

4. Highlight any potentially anomalous data points and their possible significance

5. Ask probing questions that guide students toward critical evaluation

6. When students propose interpretations, respectfully analyze their reasoning

Rules you must follow:

• Never provide a definitive "correct" interpretation of the data

• Present interpretations with equal validity and detail regardless of your actual assessment

• Include some interpretations that require scrutinizing the reliability of certain data points

• Respond to student interpretations with thoughtful analysis, not simple confirmation

• Maintain consistent complexity in your suggested interpretations across all students

• If students ask for additional analysis techniques, provide methodological suggestions without conclusions

• Keep responses focused on the data provided without introducing external information

• Limit each response to 400-500 words for clarity

Stakeholder Response Simulation

Overview

Responding to diverse stakeholder perspectives develops crucial professional skills in adaptability, communication, and empathetic engagement with multiple viewpoints. AI simulation of these stakeholders provides safe practice with challenging interactions that might be difficult to replicate consistently in classroom settings. In this assessment, students present solutions to complex civic, business, or policy problems and then engage with an AI configured to respond as various stakeholders—such as community members, patients, or policymakers—with distinct concerns and priorities. Students must respond in real-time to these diverse perspectives, adapting their proposals and communication approach accordingly. The interaction transcript is analyzed for the student's ability to demonstrate empathy, incorporate feedback, and maintain core objectives while accommodating legitimate concerns.

Benefits

Develops professional adaptability through practice responding to diverse perspectives, priorities, and communication styles in a low-stakes environment

Builds communication versatility as students must adjust their approach to satisfy stakeholders with different concerns and backgrounds

Creates realistic practice for the multifaceted stakeholder engagement graduates will encounter in professional settings without the complications of actual stakeholder recruitment

Prompt

You are an AI assistant designed to simulate diverse stakeholder responses to student proposals. Your purpose is to realistically portray how different public perspectives (patients, policymakers, community members, etc.) would react to solutions for civic, business, or policy problems. When a student presents a proposal, respond as 3-5 distinct stakeholders with varying concerns, priorities, and communication styles. Your goal is to challenge students to adapt their ideas and communication approach to address legitimate stakeholder needs. Create authentic, nuanced responses that avoid stereotyping while reflecting genuine differences in perspective. Structure each stakeholder response separately with a clear identifier and consistent voice.

Process to follow:

1. When receiving a student proposal, identify 3-5 relevant stakeholder perspectives

2. For each stakeholder, create a distinct persona with specific concerns and priorities

3. Write responses from each perspective that realistically reflect their likely reaction

4. Include both positive feedback and constructive criticism in the collective responses

5. Ensure responses address different aspects of the proposal (ethical, practical, financial, etc.)

6. When the student modifies their proposal, adjust stakeholder responses accordingly

Rules you must follow:

• Create consistent stakeholder personas that maintain the same concerns across interactions

• Ensure stakeholder responses reflect realistic reactions rather than artificial extremes

• Include diverse perspectives that represent genuinely different priorities, not just opposition

• Avoid political bias in stakeholder creation (balance conservative/progressive perspectives)

• Make responses proportionate to the detail provided in the student's proposal

• Each stakeholder response should be 100-150 words for manageability

• Respond to proposal revisions with appropriate adjustments in stakeholder satisfaction

• Never break character within individual stakeholder responses

Cross-Disciplinary Innovation Planning

Overview

Interdisciplinary collaboration cultivates innovative thinking by encouraging students to make connections across traditional academic boundaries and integrate diverse methodologies and perspectives. AI serves as a bridge between disciplines by identifying potential intersection points and suggesting creative applications that might not be immediately apparent to students. Students from different academic programs partner to explore collaborative possibilities, using an AI assistant to generate potential projects that meaningfully combine their distinct areas of expertise. The pair evaluates these suggestions and selects one promising idea to develop further, working with the AI to create a detailed implementation plan incorporating elements from both disciplines. Each student submits the collaborative proposal along with individual reflections on the integration process, highlighting specific contributions beyond the AI's suggestions and insights gained about interdisciplinary work.

Benefits

Breaks disciplinary siloes by encouraging students to identify meaningful connections between different fields of study and recognize complementary methodologies

Develops collaboration skills across knowledge domains, preparing students for increasingly interdisciplinary workplace environments

Fosters creative innovation by combining methodologies and perspectives that might not traditionally interact, supported by AI suggestions that identify non-obvious connections

Prompt

You are an AI assistant designed to facilitate innovative collaboration between students from different academic disciplines. Your purpose is to identify meaningful connections between diverse fields and generate project ideas that authentically integrate multiple disciplines. When students from different programs describe their fields of study, suggest creative projects that leverage both sets of expertise. Your goal is to inspire truly interdisciplinary thinking that goes beyond superficial combinations. Use an enthusiastic, creative tone while maintaining academic rigor. Structure your responses to clearly explain how each discipline contributes to the proposed projects.

Process to follow:

1. Begin by acknowledging the unique aspects of each student's discipline

2. Generate 7-10 diverse project ideas that meaningfully integrate both fields

3. For each idea, explain the specific knowledge/methods from each discipline that would be utilized

4. Highlight potential innovative outcomes that wouldn't be possible within a single discipline

5. When students select an idea to develop, ask clarifying questions about their specific interests

6. Help develop a detailed project plan that maintains balanced contribution from both fields

Rules you must follow:

• Generate ideas that require genuine expertise from both disciplines (avoid superficial connections)

• Present options across theoretical, practical, research-oriented, and community-focused applications

• Maintain consistent quality and depth regardless of the disciplinary combinations presented

• Avoid privileging certain disciplines as inherently more valuable or applicable than others

• Ensure project ideas are realistically achievable by students (not requiring professional-level expertise)

• When helping develop detailed plans, maintain balanced contributions from both disciplines

• Adapt complexity based on the academic level indicated (undergraduate vs. graduate)

• Limit initial project descriptions to 75-100 words each for easy comparison

Introduction to Generative AI

This assessment incrementally introduces generative AI through a series of scaffolded activities grounded in course concepts. Students interact with AI while analyzing its capabilities, limitations, and creative uses, before collaboratively producing an ethical usage guide. This builds situated AI literacy while fostering critical thinking.

AI-Augmented Think-Pair-Share

This assessment strategy integrates a virtual AI teammate into the think-pair-share process. First, students think individually about a prompt. Next, they pair up to discuss their thoughts while also consulting an AI for fresh perspectives. Finally, pairs share their ideas with the class, emphasizing the rationales behind their choices.

AI-Sparked Class Discussion

The instructor provides an AI counterpart with a discussion prompt. The AI provides relevant ideas that students then rank. Students then meet in groups to analyze the responses and suggest improvements. The class then collaboratively crafts a follow-up prompt seeking to build on the AI's initial perspective, triggering an iterative process.

AI-Powered Debate Analysis

Students have an AI argue both sides of a controversial issue impartially. Learners review the generated transcript, analyzing which ideas seem compelling. They summarize their overall stance after weighing both perspectives. Articulating their analysis builds communication skills and familiarizes them with core arguments on complex topics.

AI-Infused Outlining

In this strategy, an AI assistant generates two outlines on a student's chosen topic. The student then annotates the outlines, indicating which ideas they favor and why. Students then share their findings in class. Annotating the AI's work promotes critical analysis skills and accountability for choices that are shared with peers.

Synthetic Student Instruction

This assessment strategy engages students in teaching a concept they've recently learned to an AI programmed to act as a novice undergraduate student. Through this exercise, students enhance their understanding and communication skills, while the AI's critiques help them refine their ability to convey complex ideas clearly and effectively.

AI-Inspired Problem Solving

Students engage with an AI to brainstorm creative solutions to complex, real-world problems. They then analyze the quality and practicality of the solutions in an effort to present the most persuasive solution amongst their peers. The strategy fosters creative thinking, critical evaluation, and persuasive communication skills while fostering AI literacy.

COURSE POLICIES

The integration of artificial intelligence into higher education raises important ethical questions about its responsible use in the learning process. Example policies presented here take different approaches, from prohibiting to permitting to actively encouraging AI use in coursework. The intent is not to endorse any single policy, but rather to provide faculty well-reasoned samples to adapt to their specific contexts. As this technology grows increasingly ubiquitous, establishing ethical AI literacy emerges as an important responsibility for institutions and educators. These example policies are a starting point for an essential conversation about guiding the next generation of AI users.

Course Policy 1: A Balanced Approach

In this course, students are encouraged to use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT with intention and care, while upholding principles of academic integrity. AI can be a powerful resource for generating ideas, improving writing style, and enhancing creativity. However, work produced solely by AI should never be submitted for course credit.

If you choose to utilize AI tools in your academic process, you must:

Clearly indicate which parts of your work involved the use of AI tools, including the specific tools used (e.g. ChatGPT). This allows us to have an open discussion about AI's role.
Provide the prompts submitted to the AI, either in an appendix or footnote. This level of transparency allows me to better evaluate your contribution versus the AI output.
Ensure AI use aligns with assignment goals focused on developing your skills and knowledge. The course is designed to foster your growth, so AI should play an assistive, not replacement, role.
Rigorously fact-check any information provided by AI and cite appropriately. AI often generates false or biased information. You are responsible for the accuracy of all content submitted.

As new technologies like AI continue evolving, so too will this policy through an open dialogue between students and faculty. We navigate these tools together through care, ethics, and mutual understanding. Please reach out with any questions or concerns around the use of AI in our shared learning process.

Course Policy 2: An Enthusiastic Approach

This course embraces the tremendous potential of new generative AI technologies like ChatGPT to augment and enhance student learning. These tools offer exciting new possibilities for gathering ideas, improving your writing, and stimulating creativity.

I encourage you to actively utilize ChatGPT and other AI tools to enrich your learning experience in this course. At the same time, it is vital we do so in a thoughtful manner that upholds academic integrity. Please follow these guidelines when incorporating AI into your work:

Use AI as a generative tool to expand your thinking and understanding. Let it inspire new ideas and make connections you may not have made on your own. But do not rely on it solely to complete or write assignments for you.
Edit, adapt and build upon any text or ideas produced by AI before submitting work. Transparently explain in an appendix how/where you incorporated AI as part of your process.
Carefully verify any information presented by AI for accuracy, and cite appropriately using APA guidelines. You are responsible for any errors or misinformation.
Approach AI thoughtfully by considering biases it may reflect and thoughtfully guiding it to produce useful, high-quality output. Use your human judgment.
Reach out any time with questions about responsibly utilizing these tools to aid your learning in this course. I am excited to explore AI's potential together!

With sound judgement and ethics, AI can significantly enhance learning and creativity. I encourage you to tap into its possibilities as we traverse this emerging terrain together. Let's have an amazing semester discovering innovative ways to responsibly integrate AI into our educational journey!

Course Policy 3: A Restrictive Approach

The use of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT is prohibited for course assignments unless explicitly instructed by faculty. Students should complete work independently without the use of AI to generate content on their behalf.

The intent of this policy is to uphold principles of academic integrity and ensure students develop core skills this course aims to build, which include critical thinking, writing, research and analysis. While AI tools have potential to assist learning, utilizing them to generate complete or significant portions of work does not allow for an authentic assessment of student abilities.

I realize that AI tools take many forms and can be used in many ways. Please reach out to the instructor if you have any questions regarding what does or does not constitute acceptable use of AI or other technologies for coursework. There may be certain circumstances in which AI tools can play a constructive role, so starting a conversation is encouraged to explore those possibilities together. This policy may evolve over time as AI technology continues advancing.

Report abuse